Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Savers Value Village, Inc.
How Savers Value Village, Inc. stacks up
SVV · against 482 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #261 of 483 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score52 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -26.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SVV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 483 reported | 10.0% | 3.8% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 371 reported | -26.1% | 4.5% | 19% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 480 reported | 5.8% | 4.8% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SVV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 87 | |
| 2 | 154.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 261 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 49 | 52 | |
| 261 | 104.9B JPY (≈$713M) | 49 | 61 | |
| 261 | 763M USD | 49 | 19 | |
| 261 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 261 | 1.4B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 261 | 22.1B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 49 | 52 | |
| 267 | 15.47T IDR (≈$959M) | 48 | 65 | |
| 267 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 65 | |
| 267 | 17.7B ZAR (≈$972M) | 48 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score