Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SuperX AI Technology Limited
How SuperX AI Technology Limited stacks up
SUPX · against 279 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #208 of 280 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including SUPX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -22.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.0% vs peer median 2.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -9.7% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SUPX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SUPX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 270 reported | -70.1% | 1.6% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 293 reported | -139.1% | 4.0% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | Not reported | 1.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 273 reported | 99.4% | 46.9% | 81% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SUPX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 208 | 316M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 208 | 118M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 208 | 213M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 208 | 183M USD | 10 | 29 | |
| 208 | 208M USD | 10 | 22 | |
| 208 | 147M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 208 | 190M USD | 10 | 33 | |
| 208 | 408M USD | 10 | 27 | |
| 237 | 1.9B CNY (≈$267M) | 0 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score