Ranked #234 of 248 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
34 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including SUPV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on equity: -3.8% vs peer median 10.7%
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 96% of peers. Return on assets: -0.5% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SUPV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SUPV
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 227 reported
33.4%
9.8%
90%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 37 reported
-11.3%
8.6%
19%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 249 reported
-0.5%
1.0%
6%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 246 reported
-8.0%
10.2%
3%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 258 reported
0.0%
0.0%
1%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
