Ranked #193 of 266 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
31 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including SUJA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 32 among Consumer Defensive companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 78% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.87× vs peer median 0.42×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
●Current ratio is close to the peer norm. Current ratio: 1.53× vs peer median 1.52×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SUJA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SUJA
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 263 reported
1.01×
0.42×
17%
33%
BetaLower is better · 263 reported
Not reported
0.30
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 268 reported
1.53×
1.61×
47%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
