Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to StubHub Holdings, Inc.
How StubHub Holdings, Inc. stacks up
STUB · against 120 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #75 of 121 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including STUB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -66.4% vs peer median 8.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -77.0% vs peer median 2.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 89% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 27.6% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STUB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STUB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | -97.5% | 3.2% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | -54.6% | 7.8% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 25.8% | 7.6% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 119 reported | 70.5% | 48.5% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STUB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 71 | 2.6B USD | 39 | 34 | |
| 72 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 38 | 43 | |
| 72 | 3.6B NZD (≈$2.1B) | 38 | 53 | |
| 74 | 1.7B USD | 37 | 54 | |
| 75 | 2.3B USD | 36 | 33 | |
| 76 | 3.6B SGD (≈$2.8B) | 35 | 48 | |
| 76 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 41 | |
| 76 | 29.8B SEK (≈$3.0B) | 35 | 29 | |
| 79 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 34 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score