Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
STRA · against 223 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #132 of 224 · scores higher than 41% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)23 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including STRA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | STRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 215 reported | 0.07× | 0.35× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 218 reported | 0.50 | 0.35 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 212 reported | 1.10× | 1.80× | 22% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 6.6B HKD (≈$843M) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 128 | 35.13T IDR (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 70 | |
| 129 | 6.5B CNY (≈$906M) | 50 | 60 | |
| 130 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 49 | 39 | |
| 131 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 73 | |
| 132 | 1.6B USD | 48 | 65 | |
| 133 | 2.7B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 48 | 54 | |
| 134 | 1.3B USD | 47 | 29 | |
| 135 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 47 | 26 | |
| 136 | 1.3B AUD (≈$887M) | 47 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score