Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to StoneCo Ltd.
How StoneCo Ltd. stacks up
STNE · against 487 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 488 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score53 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including STNE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 99% of peers. EBITDA yield: 38.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Earnings yield: 35.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 40.6% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STNE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STNE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 481 reported | 35.6% | 2.4% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 492 reported | 38.8% | 4.7% | 99% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 181 reported | 40.6% | 3.2% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 483 reported | 124.5% | 33.0% | 96% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STNE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score