Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Stantec Inc.
How Stantec Inc. stacks up
STN · against 361 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #180 of 362 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including STN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 348 reported | 3.9% | 4.2% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 363 reported | 7.0% | 7.4% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 5.4% | 4.0% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 345 reported | 26.1% | 34.2% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 37.8B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 86 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 176 | 290.4B THB (≈$8.1B) | 52 | 46 | |
| 180 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 180 | 5.9B USD | 51 | 62 | |
| 180 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 58 | |
| 180 | 8.7B USD | 51 | 59 | |
| 180 | 51.1B SEK (≈$5.1B) | 51 | 57 | |
| 180 | 12.9B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 186 | 49.3B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 50 | 55 | |
| 186 | 1.94T JPY (≈$13.2B) | 50 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score