Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to STMicroelectronics N.V.
How STMicroelectronics N.V. stacks up
STM · against 92 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #93 of 93 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including STM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -89.2% vs peer median 11.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 89% of peers. Revenue growth: -11.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -9.9% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 93 reported | -11.1% | 13.6% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | -89.2% | 22.9% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 92 reported | -9.9% | 8.3% | 3% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 4 | 42.6B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 89 | 47.5B USD | 15 | 39 | |
| 90 | 8.73T JPY (≈$59.4B) | 14 | 44 | |
| 91 | 41.1B USD | 13 | 47 | |
| 92 | 38.5B EUR (≈$42.3B) | 12 | 31 | |
| 93 | 43.3B USD | 6 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score