Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Neuronetics, Inc.
How Neuronetics, Inc. stacks up
STIM · against 195 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #127 of 196 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including STIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -19.0% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -7.9% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -6.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | -19.0% | -5.3% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | -7.9% | 0.9% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 126 reported | -6.5% | -14.4% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 185 reported | 10.4% | 64.7% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 834M HKD (≈$107M) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 127 | 302M USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 127 | 139M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 127 | 223M USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 127 | 303M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 127 | 172M USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 127 | 289M USD | 8 | ||
| 127 | 227M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 127 | 113M USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 178 | 1.9B CNY (≈$270M) | 7 | 17 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score