Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Neuronetics, Inc.
How Neuronetics, Inc. stacks up
STIM · against 166 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #10 of 167 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including STIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 31.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 99.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 178 reported | 99.2% | 3.4% | 92% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 65 reported | Not reported | 0.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 164 reported | 31.8% | 3.6% | 86% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 1 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 1 | 97M USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 6 | 217M AUD (≈$143M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 9 | 110M USD | 97 | 38 | |
| 10 | 275M USD | 96 | 46 | |
| 10 | 334M USD | 96 | 49 | |
| 10 | 172M USD | 96 | 34 | |
| 13 | 274M USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 14 | 913M HKD (≈$117M) | 94 | 43 | |
| 14 | 257M USD | 94 | 55 | |
| 16 | 144.1B KRW (≈$104M) | 93 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score