Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to STERIS plc
How STERIS plc stacks up
STE · against 96 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 97 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including STE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 9.0% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 25.8% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 8.4% | 8.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 25.8% | 15.7% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 96 reported | 9.0% | 6.9% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 2 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 2 | 14.5B USD | 96 | 30 | |
| 4 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 45 | 3.53T JPY (≈$24.0B) | 57 | 68 | |
| 45 | 11.6B USD | 57 | 56 | |
| 45 | 12.6B EUR (≈$13.9B) | 57 | 73 | |
| 48 | 2.57T JPY (≈$17.5B) | 56 | 62 | |
| 48 | 22.6B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 50 | 28.7B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 50 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 52 | 32.8B USD | 54 | 69 | |
| 52 | 28.6B USD | 54 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score