Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to STAAR Surgical Company
How STAAR Surgical Company stacks up
STAA · against 588 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
44/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #210 of 589 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including STAA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 0.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STAA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 577 reported | 0.3% | -4.3% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 4.5% | -0.8% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 553 reported | -0.5% | -2.3% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 29.0% | 25.9% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STAA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 256M USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 595M USD | 96 | 97 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 2 | 289M USD | 96 | 57 | |
| 2 | 810M USD | 96 | 69 | |
| 207 | 725M USD | 45 | 19 | |
| 207 | 5.3B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 210 | 10.5B USD | 44 | 56 | |
| 210 | 5.7B USD | 44 | 38 | |
| 210 | 1.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 210 | 66.3B USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 210 | 5.9B USD | 44 | 39 | |
| 215 | 4.6B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 215 | 1.7B USD | 43 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score