Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ST · against 312 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #233 of 313 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 26
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)37 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 302 reported | 0.83× | 0.30× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 296 reported | 1.25 | 1.02 | 30% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 310 reported | 2.29× | 1.83× | 62% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 229 | 218.1B TWD (≈$6.8B) | 27 | 48 | |
| 230 | 27.8B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 26 | 41 | |
| 231 | 8.08T KRW (≈$5.8B) | 26 | 51 | |
| 232 | 47.7B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 26 | 29 | |
| 233 | 6.1B USD | 26 | 39 | |
| 234 | 4.2B USD | 25 | 48 | |
| 235 | 38.9B CNY (≈$5.4B) | 25 | 48 | |
| 236 | 33.8B CNY (≈$4.7B) | 25 | 39 | |
| 237 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 25 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score