Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The E.W. Scripps Company
How The E.W. Scripps Company stacks up
SSP · against 89 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
25/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #61 of 90 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including SSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -490.3% vs peer median 2.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -33.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.1% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SSP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | -524.2% | 1.2% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | 8.2% | 9.3% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 14.1% | 9.8% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | -127.8% | 83.6% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SSP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 1 | 134M EUR (≈$147M) | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 208.1B KRW (≈$150M) | 97 | 63 | |
| 5 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 57 | 19.5B JPY (≈$133M) | 30 | 71 | |
| 58 | 315M EUR (≈$346M) | 29 | 44 | |
| 59 | 5.6B THB (≈$158M) | 27 | 45 | |
| 60 | 360.5B KRW (≈$260M) | 26 | 37 | |
| 61 | 249M USD | 25 | 11 | |
| 62 | 3.1B CNY (≈$438M) | 23 | 62 | |
| 63 | 472M USD | 21 | 28 | |
| 63 | 240M USD | 21 | 21 | |
| 65 | 3.4B CNY (≈$475M) | 20 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score