Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
How SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. stacks up
SSNC · against 165 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #115 of 166 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including SSNC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.6% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SSNC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SSNC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 166 reported | 8.6% | 15.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 11.6% | 22.0% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 164 reported | 6.8% | 10.1% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SSNC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 3 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 112 | 14.5B USD | 52 | 68 | |
| 112 | 13.6B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 112 | 13.3B USD | 52 | 76 | |
| 115 | 11.3B USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 115 | 19.0B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 117 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 50 | 47 | |
| 117 | 1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 50 | 64 | |
| 117 | 18.8B USD | 50 | 64 | |
| 117 | 20.2B USD | 50 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score