Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Surrozen, Inc.
How Surrozen, Inc. stacks up
SRZN · against 383 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #356 of 384 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including SRZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -287.3% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 92% of peers. Operating margin: -385.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SRZN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SRZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 352 reported | Not reported | 0.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 355 reported | -385.3% | 3.2% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 383 reported | -287.3% | -0.2% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 362 reported | Not reported | -1.1% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 403 reported | -200.4% | 37.1% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SRZN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 352 | 475M USD | 7 | 22 | |
| 352 | 705M USD | 7 | 32 | |
| 356 | 13.0B TWD (≈$402M) | 6 | 49 | |
| 356 | 4.6B SEK (≈$462M) | 6 | 37 | |
| 356 | 354M USD | 6 | 13 | |
| 356 | 314M USD | 6 | 56 | |
| 360 | 397M USD | 5 | 37 | |
| 360 | 389M USD | 5 | 33 | |
| 360 | 274M USD | 5 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score