Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Stoneridge, Inc.
How Stoneridge, Inc. stacks up
SRI · against 208 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
20/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #143 of 209 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including SRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 81% of peers. Revenue growth: -5.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 214 reported | -5.2% | 1.3% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 108 reported | Not reported | -1.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 207 reported | -1.5% | 1.0% | 41% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 4 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 98 | 88 | |
| 5 | 42.7B JPY (≈$290M) | 96 | 80 | |
| 138 | 1.0B MYR (≈$230M) | 23 | 63 | |
| 141 | 151.5B KRW (≈$109M) | 22 | 38 | |
| 141 | 402M AUD (≈$265M) | 22 | 40 | |
| 143 | 1.9B HKD (≈$240M) | 20 | 36 | |
| 143 | 165M USD | 20 | 17 | |
| 145 | 1.1B HKD (≈$139M) | 19 | 47 | |
| 146 | 967M SAR (≈$261M) | 18 | 16 | |
| 146 | 7.3B TWD (≈$227M) | 18 | 62 | |
| 146 | 6.3B TWD (≈$195M) | 18 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score