Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sportradar Group AG
How Sportradar Group AG stacks up
SRAD · against 359 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
80/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #58 of 360 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score33 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including SRAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SRAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SRAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 354 reported | 0.4% | 2.4% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 364 reported | 14.8% | 4.5% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 169 reported | 5.2% | 3.0% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 357 reported | 26.4% | 26.5% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SRAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 2 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 58 | 475.2B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 80 | 78 | |
| 58 | 4.3B USD | 80 | 51 | |
| 58 | 6.3B USD | 80 | 63 | |
| 58 | 6.4B USD | 80 | 47 | |
| 58 | 4.2B USD | 80 | 68 | |
| 58 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 80 | 47 | |
| 64 | 174.6B TWD (≈$5.4B) | 79 | 48 | |
| 64 | 81.3B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 64 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 79 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score