Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SRAD · against 364 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #258 of 365 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including SRAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SRAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 350 reported | 0.08× | 0.29× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 350 reported | 1.58 | 1.01 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 361 reported | 0.98× | 1.86× | 8% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 254 | 116.7B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 30 | 41 | |
| 255 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 30 | 39 | |
| 256 | 7.3B USD | 29 | 50 | |
| 257 | 17.0B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 258 | 4.2B USD | 29 | 68 | |
| 259 | 6.5B USD | 29 | 66 | |
| 260 | 4.3B USD | 29 | 43 | |
| 261 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 28 | 56 | |
| 262 | 35.7B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 28 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score