Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
How Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. stacks up
SQM · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #168 of 183 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including SQM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 97% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -24.7% vs peer median -0.0%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -14.2% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.0% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SQM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SQM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 1.0% | 9.9% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -14.2% | 17.1% | 26% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -24.7% | 1.5% | 1% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SQM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 164 | 791M USD | 19 | 22 | |
| 164 | 5.4B USD | 19 | 44 | |
| 167 | 353M USD | 18 | 28 | |
| 168 | 7.5B USD | 17 | 42 | |
| 168 | 15.3B USD | 17 | 54 | |
| 170 | 14M USD | 16 | 26 | |
| 170 | 21.3B USD | 16 | 30 | |
| 172 | 442M USD | 15 | 38 | |
| 172 | 1.3B USD | 15 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score