Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SPWH · against 69 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #59 of 70 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SPWH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SPWH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 68 reported | 3.11× | 0.68× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 69 reported | 0.42 | 0.33 | 37% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 70 reported | 1.17× | 1.36× | 43% | 33% |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score