Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
How Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. stacks up
SPWH · against 70 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
14/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #44 of 71 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score23 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including SPWH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 14?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 87% of peers. Operating margin: -1.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on assets: -0.8% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on invested capital: -0.4% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPWH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SPWH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 63 reported | -0.4% | 1.3% | 39% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 69 reported | -1.2% | 1.0% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 70 reported | -0.8% | 0.7% | 25% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 68 reported | -25.8% | -3.2% | 21% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 71 reported | 30.9% | 24.4% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SPWHScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score