Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SPS Commerce, Inc.
How SPS Commerce, Inc. stacks up
SPSC · against 422 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #142 of 423 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SPSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SPSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 416 reported | 2.4% | 2.4% | 51% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 427 reported | 6.3% | 4.4% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 170 reported | 6.5% | 3.2% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 418 reported | 30.4% | 28.2% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SPSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 142 | 2.2B USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 142 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 64 | 49 | |
| 142 | 200.9B INR (≈$2.4B) | 64 | 57 | |
| 142 | 5.5B USD | 64 | 43 | |
| 142 | 3.1B USD | 64 | 68 | |
| 148 | 38.9B CNY (≈$5.4B) | 63 | 48 | |
| 148 | 30.2B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 63 | 64 | |
| 148 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 63 | 81 | |
| 148 | 13.7B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 63 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score