Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SPB · against 206 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #114 of 207 · scores higher than 45% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SPB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SPB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 200 reported | 0.39× | 0.33× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 203 reported | 0.64 | 0.35 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 196 reported | 2.41× | 1.82× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 110 | 1.90T CLP (≈$2.1B) | 55 | 46 | |
| 111 | 204.4B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 112 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 54 | 19 | |
| 113 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 54 | 75 | |
| 114 | 2.0B USD | 53 | 46 | |
| 115 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 53 | 21 | |
| 116 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 42 | |
| 117 | 39.0B ZAR (≈$2.1B) | 51 | 66 | |
| 118 | 36.2B TRY (≈$1.1B) | 51 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score