Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sony Group Corporation
How Sony Group Corporation stacks up
SONY · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #147 of 497 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SONY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.2% vs peer median 2.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.6% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SONY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SONY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 4.3% | 2.0% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 8.3% | 4.3% | 77% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 6.3% | 3.6% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 31.9% | 25.0% | 59% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SONY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 842M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 353M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 147 | 3.1B USD | 66 | 54 | |
| 147 | 33.3B USD | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score