Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SON · against 294 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #176 of 295 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including SON · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity and current ratio than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 285 reported | 1.32× | 0.60× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 286 reported | 0.35 | 0.83 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 283 reported | 0.99× | 1.47× | 19% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 172 | 767.7B JPY (≈$5.2B) | 34 | 59 | |
| 173 | 3.3B EUR (≈$3.6B) | 34 | 48 | |
| 174 | 3.5B USD | 34 | 41 | |
| 175 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 34 | 58 | |
| 176 | 4.8B USD | 33 | 67 | |
| 177 | 3.3B USD | 32 | 60 | |
| 178 | 3.5B USD | 32 | 34 | |
| 179 | 4.0B USD | 32 | 62 | |
| 180 | 4.7B USD | 31 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score