Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SOC · against 82 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 83 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including SOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 80 reported | 2.50× | 0.55× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 80 reported | -0.16 | 0.45 | 94% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 84 reported | 0.24× | 1.42× | 0% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 77 | 759M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 78 | 811M AUD (≈$535M) | 3 | 1 | |
| 79 | 551M GBP (≈$716M) | 2 | 37 | |
| 80 | 5.0B NOK (≈$477M) | 2 | 34 | |
| 81 | 476M USD | 2 | 2 | |
| 82 | 3.3B HKD (≈$427M) | 0 | 30 | |
| 83 | 392M USD | 0 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score