Ranked #314 of 314 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 0
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
35 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including SMG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 0 among Basic Materials companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
▼Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group. Debt / equity: — vs peer median 0.36×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 95% of peers. Beta: 1.81 vs peer median 0.69
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 75% of peers. Current ratio: 1.22× vs peer median 1.76×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SMG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 311 reported
Not reported
0.39×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 304 reported
1.81
0.76
5%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 292 reported
1.22×
1.71×
21%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
