Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
How The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company stacks up
SMG · against 221 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #80 of 222 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SMG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.3% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SMG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | 4.1% | 3.0% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 8.9% | 8.9% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | 7.3% | 2.3% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | -5.8% | 45.5% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SMG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.2B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 76 | 3.2B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 76 | 45.5B USD | 60 | 47 | |
| 76 | 1.8B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 80 | 2.6B USD | 59 | 45 | |
| 80 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 43 | |
| 82 | 5.9B USD | 58 | 53 | |
| 82 | 182M USD | 58 | 53 | |
| 84 | 442M USD | 57 | 38 | |
| 84 | 8.3B USD | 57 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score