Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Summit Midstream Corporation
How Summit Midstream Corporation stacks up
SMC · against 73 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #42 of 74 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including SMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.7% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | -3.5% | 3.1% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | 10.0% | 10.6% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | 10.9% | 6.1% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 129.6% | 83.0% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 4 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 96 | 77 | |
| 38 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 43 | 39 | |
| 39 | 665M USD | 42 | 30 | |
| 39 | 448M USD | 42 | 42 | |
| 41 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 40 | 66 | |
| 42 | 412M USD | 36 | 42 | |
| 43 | 408M USD | 34 | 55 | |
| 44 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 33 | 45 | |
| 45 | 755M USD | 32 | 41 | |
| 46 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 29 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score