Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SMC · against 76 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #62 of 77 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 74 reported | 1.35× | 0.51× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 74 reported | 0.74 | 0.45 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 78 reported | 0.94× | 1.28× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 58 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 17 | 35 | |
| 59 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 16 | 31 | |
| 60 | 5.1B CNY (≈$715M) | 15 | 11 | |
| 61 | 4.2B NOK (≈$400M) | 13 | 18 | |
| 62 | 412M USD | 11 | 42 | |
| 63 | 534M USD | 10 | 38 | |
| 64 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 10 | 19 | |
| 65 | 306M USD | 9 | 48 | |
| 66 | 809M USD | 8 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score