Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Summit Midstream Corporation
How Summit Midstream Corporation stacks up
SMC · against 77 other Energy companies of similar size
Profitability
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 78 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including SMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on assets: 0.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on invested capital: 4.3% vs peer median 9.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 15.8% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 76 reported | 4.3% | 6.7% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 76 reported | 15.8% | 6.9% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 77 reported | 0.4% | 1.8% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 73 reported | -2.9% | 3.5% | 26% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 78 reported | 45.1% | 30.5% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 13.08T IDR (≈$811M) | 96 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 94 | 60 | |
| 3 | 254M USD | 94 | 88 | |
| 5 | 496M USD | 90 | 85 | |
| 36 | 318M USD | 30 | 44 | |
| 37 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 29 | 52 | |
| 37 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 29 | 47 | |
| 37 | 580M CAD (≈$424M) | 29 | 47 | |
| 37 | 412M USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 41 | 328M USD | 28 | 54 | |
| 42 | 261M USD | 27 | 56 | |
| 43 | 3.3B HKD (≈$427M) | 25 | 30 | |
| 44 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 24 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score