Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Summit Midstream Corporation
How Summit Midstream Corporation stacks up
SMC · against 69 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 70 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 84% of peers. Revenue growth: 20.9% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 15.0% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 74 reported | 20.9% | -1.6% | 82% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 39 reported | Not reported | -1.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 69 reported | 15.0% | -1.6% | 93% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 3 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 92 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$337M) | 92 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 90 | 80 | |
| 8 | 408M USD | 83 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score