Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sylvamo Corporation
How Sylvamo Corporation stacks up
SLVM · against 490 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
73/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #110 of 491 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SLVM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.9% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.0% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 18.0% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SLVM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SLVM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 480 reported | 5.9% | 3.7% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 16.6% | 8.6% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | -0.9% | 2.8% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 470 reported | 75.5% | 59.2% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SLVM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 764M EUR (≈$840M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 629.2B CLP (≈$692M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 110 | 153.0B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 73 | 37 | |
| 110 | 107.2B JPY (≈$729M) | 73 | 65 | |
| 110 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 73 | 70 | |
| 110 | 614M EUR (≈$675M) | 73 | 44 | |
| 110 | 1.3B USD | 73 | 40 | |
| 121 | 5.3B CNY (≈$743M) | 72 | 62 | |
| 121 | 2.3B SAR (≈$633M) | 72 | 75 | |
| 121 | 192.2B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 121 | 142.1B JPY (≈$966M) | 72 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score