Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SLP · against 405 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #172 of 406 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)52 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including SLP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 371 reported | 0.00× | 0.19× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 391 reported | 1.33 | 0.44 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 398 reported | 5.54× | 2.91× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 3 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.7B CNY (≈$375M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 168 | 2.7B CNY (≈$382M) | 65 | 46 | |
| 169 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 65 | 28 | |
| 170 | 5.3B CNY (≈$743M) | 65 | 65 | |
| 171 | 394M USD | 64 | 37 | |
| 172 | 374M USD | 64 | 66 | |
| 173 | 55.7B JPY (≈$379M) | 64 | 64 | |
| 174 | 4.6B CNY (≈$639M) | 64 | 68 | |
| 175 | 474M USD | 63 | 46 | |
| 176 | 862M AUD (≈$569M) | 63 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score