Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SLM Corporation
How SLM Corporation stacks up
SLMBP · against 366 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #120 of 367 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including SLMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 84.5% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SLMBP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SLMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 7.3% | 7.4% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 84.5% | 9.9% | 85% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 2.9% | 10.0% | 27% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SLMBP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 117 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 68 | 49 | |
| 117 | 6.5B AUD (≈$4.3B) | 68 | 61 | |
| 120 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 45 | |
| 120 | 87.2B USD | 67 | 49 | |
| 120 | Unavailable | 67 | 43 | |
| 120 | 447.2B INR (≈$5.4B) | 67 | ||
| 124 | 21.2B BRL (≈$3.8B) | 66 | 66 | |
| 124 | 566.9B USD | 66 | 48 | |
| 124 | 31.6B USD | 66 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score