Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Standard Lithium Ltd.
How Standard Lithium Ltd. stacks up
SLI · against 414 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #340 of 415 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including SLI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -12.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -16.1% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.5% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SLI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SLI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 392 reported | -16.1% | 2.2% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 424 reported | -12.2% | 6.8% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | -3.5% | -1.4% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 391 reported | 109.4% | 74.4% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SLI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 99 | 81 | |
| 5 | 3.9B CNY (≈$546M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 340 | 393M USD | 8 | ||
| 340 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score