Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Champion Homes, Inc.
How Champion Homes, Inc. stacks up
SKY · against 300 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #202 of 301 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SKY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -8.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SKY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SKY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 301 reported | 4.5% | 5.0% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 260 reported | -8.3% | 7.6% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 4.4% | 5.4% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SKY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 197 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 46 | 55 | |
| 197 | 397.3B INR (≈$4.8B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 202 | 37.4B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 45 | 75 | |
| 202 | 5.4B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 202 | 4.7B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 205 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 44 | 35 | |
| 206 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 43 | 53 | |
| 206 | 625.7B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 43 | 51 | |
| 206 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 43 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score