Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
How SK Telecom Co., Ltd. stacks up
SKM · against 70 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #70 of 71 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including SKM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -83.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 80% of peers. Revenue growth: -4.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.4% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SKM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SKM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 72 reported | -4.7% | 5.6% | 6% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 55 reported | -83.7% | 10.3% | 4% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 71 reported | -0.4% | 6.0% | 11% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SKM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 3 | 18.0B USD | 97 | 71 | |
| 4 | 46.5B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 96 | 42 | |
| 5 | 12.74T KRW (≈$9.2B) | 94 | 70 | |
| 66 | 179.1B NOK (≈$17.0B) | 21 | 52 | |
| 67 | 192.8B SEK (≈$19.3B) | 20 | 37 | |
| 68 | 5.9B USD | 17 | 23 | |
| 69 | 65.5B BRL (≈$11.8B) | 14 | 46 | |
| 70 | 11.7B USD | 12 | 41 | |
| 71 | 10.6B EUR (≈$11.6B) | 6 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score