Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SJM · against 88 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #73 of 89 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score8 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including SJM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | SJM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 87 reported | 5.2% | 10.2% | 21% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 89 reported | 9.0% | 10.2% | 47% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 83 reported | 1.4% | 5.1% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 83 reported | 3.9% | 12.1% | 13% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 89 reported | 38.0% | 37.0% | 55% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.19T INR (≈$14.2B) | 97 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 13.7B USD | 95 | 51 | |
| 5 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 93 | 57 | |
| 70 | 2.44T JPY (≈$16.6B) | 40 | 46 | |
| 71 | 231.3B TWD (≈$7.2B) | 39 | 35 | |
| 71 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.6B) | 39 | 47 | |
| 73 | 426.3B TRY (≈$12.8B) | 37 | 53 | |
| 73 | 13.7B USD | 37 | 46 | |
| 75 | 7.5B GBP (≈$9.8B) | 35 | 37 | |
| 76 | 11.7B USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 77 | 7.5B USD | 32 | 43 | |
| 78 | 13.1B USD | 31 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score