Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SITM · against 191 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #65 of 192 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SITM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SITM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 181 reported | 1.29× | 0.34× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 183 reported | 2.86 | 1.03 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 191 reported | 19.45× | 1.67× | 100% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 61 | 17.07T KRW (≈$12.3B) | 58 | 62 | |
| 62 | 3.65T JPY (≈$24.8B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 63 | 10.9B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 64 | 13.0B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 65 | 13.3B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 66 | 6.7B USD | 55 | 68 | |
| 67 | 13.6B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 68 | 9.6B USD | 54 | 42 | |
| 69 | 18.8B USD | 54 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score