Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SiTime Corporation
How SiTime Corporation stacks up
SITM · against 187 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 188 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score29 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SITM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 32.7% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 83.0% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SITM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SITM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 190 reported | 83.0% | 15.2% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 158 reported | Not reported | 19.6% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 32.7% | 10.0% | 93% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SITM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 1 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 1 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 1 | 13.3B USD | 98 | 50 | |
| 6 | 9.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 6 | 6.8B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 6 | 10.0B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 6 | 20.6B USD | 97 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score