Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Silicom Ltd.
How Silicom Ltd. stacks up
SILC · against 228 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #165 of 229 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including SILC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -6.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.3% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SILC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SILC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 221 reported | -6.3% | 1.4% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 240 reported | -6.0% | 4.0% | 17% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | Not reported | 0.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | 63.1% | 48.1% | 61% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SILC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2.4B HKD (≈$301M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 4 | 35.6B JPY (≈$242M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 165 | 159M USD | 10 | 43 | |
| 165 | 316M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 165 | 118M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 165 | 213M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 165 | 183M USD | 10 | 29 | |
| 165 | 208M USD | 10 | 22 | |
| 165 | 147M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 165 | 190M USD | 10 | 33 | |
| 191 | 1.9B CNY (≈$267M) | 0 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score