Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Silicom Ltd.
How Silicom Ltd. stacks up
SILC · against 225 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #141 of 226 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score34 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including SILC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -25.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SILC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SILC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 235 reported | 6.6% | 1.4% | 64% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 110 reported | Not reported | -8.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 226 reported | -25.6% | -0.7% | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SILC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 218M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 287M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 4 | 29.8B JPY (≈$203M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2.8B NOK (≈$270M) | 94 | 47 | |
| 138 | 9.6B TWD (≈$296M) | 23 | 49 | |
| 138 | 2.5B CNY (≈$354M) | 23 | 26 | |
| 138 | 3.7B SEK (≈$365M) | 23 | 56 | |
| 141 | 10.5B TWD (≈$326M) | 22 | 48 | |
| 141 | 183M USD | 22 | 29 | |
| 141 | 172M USD | 22 | 33 | |
| 144 | 1.9B CNY (≈$263M) | 21 | 16 | |
| 145 | 244M EUR (≈$269M) | 20 | 42 | |
| 145 | 302M CHF (≈$347M) | 20 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score