Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SIGA Technologies, Inc.
How SIGA Technologies, Inc. stacks up
SIGA · against 260 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #166 of 261 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score96 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including SIGA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -9.8% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -9.2% vs peer median 0.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.2% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SIGA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SIGA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 244 reported | -1.3% | -0.9% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | -9.8% | 1.4% | 28% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | -9.2% | -12.1% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 74.0% | 61.2% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SIGA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 166 | 427M USD | 8 | 7 | |
| 166 | 421M USD | 8 | 52 | |
| 166 | 139M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 166 | 388M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 166 | 223M USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 166 | 303M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 166 | 354M USD | 8 | 13 | |
| 166 | 172M USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 166 | 371M USD | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score