Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SIGA Technologies, Inc.
How SIGA Technologies, Inc. stacks up
SIGA · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
4/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #431 of 455 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score44 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including SIGA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 4?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: -70.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -18.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SIGA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SIGA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | -70.1% | 11.0% | 6% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | -61.0% | 21.2% | 8% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | -18.1% | 11.0% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SIGA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 423 | 91.2B USD | 5 | 18 | |
| 423 | 26.0B USD | 5 | 28 | |
| 431 | 320M USD | 4 | 44 | |
| 431 | 7.8B USD | 4 | 30 | |
| 431 | 223M USD | 4 | 34 | |
| 431 | 184M USD | 4 | 33 | |
| 431 | 1.8B USD | 4 | 23 | |
| 436 | 271M USD | 3 | 14 | |
| 436 | 475M USD | 3 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score