Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Steven Madden, Ltd.
How Steven Madden, Ltd. stacks up
SHOO · against 327 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #204 of 328 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SHOO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SHOO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SHOO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 327 reported | 4.6% | 5.5% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 334 reported | 7.8% | 9.5% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 7.0% | 6.0% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 329 reported | 29.2% | 44.6% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SHOO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 204 | 12.4B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 44 | 45 | |
| 204 | 415.1B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 44 | 69 | |
| 204 | 2.8B USD | 44 | 55 | |
| 204 | 2.5B USD | 44 | 43 | |
| 204 | 3.2B USD | 44 | 65 | |
| 212 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 43 | 52 | |
| 212 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 43 | 58 | |
| 214 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 53 | |
| 214 | 60.1B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score