Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Shoe Station Group Inc.
How Shoe Station Group Inc. stacks up
SHOE · against 543 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #139 of 544 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SHOE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 17.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SHOE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SHOE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 532 reported | 6.2% | 3.1% | 69% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 556 reported | 12.6% | 8.3% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 17.2% | 7.2% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | 175.1% | 66.5% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SHOE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 139 | 32.7B JPY (≈$222M) | 74 | 68 | |
| 139 | 105.6B JPY (≈$718M) | 74 | 55 | |
| 139 | 454M USD | 74 | 45 | |
| 139 | 423M EUR (≈$465M) | 74 | 66 | |
| 139 | 387M USD | 74 | 47 | |
| 145 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 73 | 44 | |
| 145 | 6.3B TWD (≈$196M) | 73 | 58 | |
| 145 | 3.8B CNY (≈$531M) | 73 | 71 | |
| 145 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 73 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score