Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SHLS · against 528 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #374 of 529 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)48 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including SHLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SHLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 510 reported | 0.38× | 0.22× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 508 reported | 1.89 | 0.77 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 523 reported | 2.25× | 1.88× | 61% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 370 | 6.0B CNY (≈$846M) | 34 | 36 | |
| 371 | 6.5B CNY (≈$916M) | 34 | 48 | |
| 372 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 34 | 30 | |
| 373 | 750M USD | 33 | 34 | |
| 374 | 1.4B USD | 32 | 54 | |
| 375 | 81.3B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 32 | 76 | |
| 376 | 6.6B CNY (≈$917M) | 32 | 25 | |
| 377 | 655M EUR (≈$720M) | 32 | 43 | |
| 378 | 2.2B USD | 32 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score